Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10850K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10850K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 891 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10850K.
Advantages of Core i9-10850K
- Up to 56% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $292.79 vs $671.13
- Up to 43% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $4.57 vs $7.99 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 31% better in Starfield than Core i9-10850K - 84 vs 64 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10850K - 32 vs 20 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
64
76%
Value, €/FPS
€4.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€292.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €292.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7158 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
84
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.99/FPS
57%
Price, €
€671.13
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for €671.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7158 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10850K | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |