Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10850K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10850K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 891 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10850K.
Advantages of Core i9-10850K
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $242.68 vs $730.45
- Up to 64% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i5-13400F - $1.10 vs $3.08 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Sea of Thieves than Core i9-10850K - 263 vs 246 FPS
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
246
94%
Value, €/FPS
€1.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€269.37
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €269.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
Buy for €810.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10850K | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |