Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10850K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10850K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1177 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10850K.
Advantages of Core i9-10850K
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $292.79 vs $375.64
- Up to 9% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-14900KF - $2.14 vs $2.35 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 17% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-10850K - 160 vs 137 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10850K - 32 vs 20 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
137
86%
Value, €/FPS
€2.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€292.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €292.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7448 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.35/FPS
91%
Price, €
€375.64
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for €375.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7447 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10850K | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |