Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10850K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10850K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 1177 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10850K.
Advantages of Core i9-10850K
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $292.79 vs $390.09
- Up to 14% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-14900K - $1.70 vs $1.98 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 15% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-10850K - 197 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10850K - 32 vs 20 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
172
87%
Value, €/FPS
€1.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€292.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €292.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6836 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
197
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.98/FPS
86%
Price, €
€390.09
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for €390.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6835 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10850K | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |