The Core i7-920 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-7300 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $28.49 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-920
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i3-7300
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 36% cheaper – $50.79 vs $79.28
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 51 vs 130 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i7-920 cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Core i7-920 vs Core i3-7300 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-7300
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
185
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, €
€50.79
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Core i7-920 vs Core i3-7300 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-920 vs Core i3-7300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-920 vs Core i3-7300 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.67 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
2.93 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-7300
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-920 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-7300 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Kaby Lake |
130 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |