Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-875K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 4602 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Core i7-875K
- Up to 77% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $141.23 vs $604.65
- Up to 73% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.68 vs $2.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 95 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i7-875K - 263 vs 230 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
230
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€156.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €156.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
263
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.55/FPS
27%
Price, €
€671.16
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for €671.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-875K | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 120 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |