Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-875K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4888 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Core i7-875K
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $61.36 vs $390.09
- Up to 33% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-14900K - $2.45 vs $3.68 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 324% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i7-875K - 106 vs 25 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
25
24%
Value, €/FPS
€2.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€61.36
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €61.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7106 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
106
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.68/FPS
67%
Price, €
€390.09
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €390.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7105 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-875K | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |