Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-5930K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-5930K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1074 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-5930K.
Advantages of Core i7-5930K
- Up to 43% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $321.95 vs $560.32
- Up to 40% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $1.60 vs $2.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 4% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-5930K - 210 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5930K - 32 vs 12 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
201
96%
Value, €/FPS
€1.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€321.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €321.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 435 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
210
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.67/FPS
60%
Price, €
€560.32
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for €560.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 435 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-5930K | vs | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell E | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |