In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-4700MQ is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-10900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-4700MQ
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 47 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 62% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900KF
- Up to 34% faster in Battlefield 6 – 90 vs 67 FPS
- Up to 34% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs May 27, 2013
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-4700MQ vs Core i9-10900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-4700MQ vs Core i9-10900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-4700MQ vs Core i9-10900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-4700MQ
May 27th, 2013
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
64%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
55%
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-4700MQ May 27th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900KF Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 27th, 2013 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$383.00 | MSRP | $509.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGA1200 |
47 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
