The Core i7-2600S is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-13900, however, it's a much better value for money, as it's $437.83 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i7-2600S
- Up to 93% cheaper – $35.14 vs $472.97
- A much better value for money for gaming
Advantages of the Core i9-13900
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 8 threads
Core i7-2600S vs Core i9-13900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-2600S
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
169
79%
Min 1% FPS
114
81%
Price, €
€35.14
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
215
100%
Min 1% FPS
141
100%
Price, €
€472.97
7%
Value, €/FPS
€2.19/FPS
9%
Core i7-2600S vs Core i9-13900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2600S vs Core i9-13900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2600S vs Core i9-13900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2600S
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
68%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-2600S | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Not Available | MSRP | $549.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.6 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 36 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |