Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 5700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 5700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 275 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 5700.
Advantages of Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 5700 - 216 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 5700 - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $103.07 vs $405.00
- Up to 73% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-13900 - $0.57 vs $2.08 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €449.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
200
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€114.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €114.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |