Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700 is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Core i7-14700
- Performs up to 4% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-10700F - 167 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 28 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-10700F
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i7-14700 - $181.80 vs $267.83
- Up to 29% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-14700 - $1.26 vs $1.78 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €297.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
160
96%
Value, €/FPS
€1.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€201.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €201.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-14700 | vs | Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 8 |
28 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |