Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-12700F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-12700F is 1608 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 12% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 386 vs 344 FPS
- Up to 62% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $212.60 vs $563.02
- Up to 66% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.55 vs $1.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-12700F - 32 vs 20 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
386
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€212.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €212.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 238 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
344
89%
Value, €/FPS
€1.64/FPS
34%
Price, €
€563.02
37%
Buy for €563.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 239 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-12700F | vs | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |