Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1538 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400.
Advantages of Core i5-9400
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $64.12 vs $730.45
- Up to 88% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-13400F - $0.20 vs $1.66 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 35% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-9400 - 488 vs 361 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 16 vs 6 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
361
74%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€71.17
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €71.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Buy for €810.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-9400 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |