Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-12700K outperforms the more expensive Core i5-9400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-12700K is 1112 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-9400.
Advantages of Core i5-9400
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-12700K
- Performs up to 27% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-9400 - 705 vs 556 FPS
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i5-9400 - $168.01 vs $248.41
- Up to 48% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-9400 - $0.26 vs $0.50 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 20 vs 6 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €275.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
705
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€186.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €186.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-9400 | vs | Core i7-12700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |