Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400.
Advantages of Core i5-7400
- Up to 84% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $96.59 vs $604.65
- Up to 51% better value when playing League of Legends than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.79 vs $1.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 207% better in League of Legends than Core i5-7400 - 414 vs 135 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 32 vs 4 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
135
33%
Value, €/FPS
€0.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€107.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €107.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
414
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.62/FPS
49%
Price, €
€671.16
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €671.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-7400 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |