Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400.
Advantages of Core i5-7400
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $96.59 vs $259.70
- Up to 45% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-13700K - $1.95 vs $3.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 49% better in Starfield than Core i5-7400 - 82 vs 55 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 24 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
55
67%
Value, €/FPS
€1.95/FPS
100%
Price, €
€107.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €107.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
82
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.52/FPS
55%
Price, €
€288.27
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for €288.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-7400 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |