Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3503 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670.
Advantages of Core i5-4670
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $46.26 vs $730.45
- Up to 93% better value when playing Control than Core i5-13400F - $0.26 vs $3.96 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Core i5-4670 - 205 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 16 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
201
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.35
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Buy for €810.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-4670 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
84 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |