Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3330 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3775 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Core i5-3330
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $80.35 vs $604.65
- Up to 85% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.62 vs $4.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 77 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 14% better in Dead Space than Core i5-3330 - 166 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 32 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
145
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.19
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €89.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
166
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.04/FPS
15%
Price, €
€671.16
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for €671.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3330 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |