Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3330 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 3349 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Core i5-3330
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - $150.15 vs $251.35
- Up to 1% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i9-12900K - $2.46 vs $2.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 77 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 66% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i5-3330 - 101 vs 61 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 24 vs 4 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
61
60%
Value, €/FPS
€2.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€150.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €150.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7201 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
101
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.49/FPS
99%
Price, €
€251.35
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for €251.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7201 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3330 | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |