Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 365 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12400F.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-12400F - 123 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-12400F
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $99.05 vs $810.80
- Up to 88% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-13400F - $0.82 vs $6.59 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €810.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
121
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€99.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €99.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13400F | vs | Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |