Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 426 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12600K.
Advantages of Core i5-12600K
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $140.41 vs $328.70
- Up to 57% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i9-13900F - $0.64 vs $1.48 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 2% better in Death Stranding than Core i5-12600K - 246 vs 242 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12600K - 32 vs 16 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
242
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€155.85
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €155.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
246
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.48/FPS
43%
Price, €
€364.86
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for €364.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12600K | vs | Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |