Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-14700F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-13900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-14700F is 369 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-13900F.
Advantages of Core i9-13900F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-14700F - 32 vs 28 threads
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 0% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-13900F - 228 vs 227 FPS
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $221.72 vs $328.70
- Up to 33% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-13900F - $1.08 vs $1.61 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €364.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 698 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
228
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€246.11
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €246.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 698 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900F | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 20 |
32 | Threads | 28 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |