Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 266 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12400F.
Advantages of Core i5-12400F
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $99.65 vs $359.46
- Up to 69% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i9-13900KF - $0.63 vs $2.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 11% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i5-12400F - 176 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 32 vs 12 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
158
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€99.65
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €99.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6535 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
176
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.04/FPS
31%
Price, €
€359.46
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €359.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6534 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12400F | vs | Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |