Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 294 days older than the cheaper Core i5-12400F.
Advantages of Core i5-12400F
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - $90.37 vs $255.66
- Up to 64% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-11900KF - $0.49 vs $1.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-12400F - 207 vs 204 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
204
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€100.31
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €100.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
207
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.37/FPS
36%
Price, €
€283.78
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for €283.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12400F | vs | Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |