Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 365 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12400F.
Advantages of Core i5-12400F
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $90.37 vs $216.70
- Up to 56% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-13700F - $0.77 vs $1.77 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-12400F - 136 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 24 vs 12 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
130
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
100%
Price, €
€100.31
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €100.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.77/FPS
44%
Price, €
€240.54
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for €240.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12400F | vs | Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |