Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12400F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-11600 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12400F is 294 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-11600.
Advantages of Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Starfield than Core i5-11600 - 71 vs 70 FPS
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $99.05 vs $126.13
- Up to 22% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-11600 - $1.40 vs $1.80 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
71
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€99.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €99.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280 minutes ago
Buy for €126.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12400F | vs | Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |