The Core i5-11400F is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-6100 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only $90.39 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i5-11400F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of the FX-6100
- Up to 77% cheaper – $26.71 vs $117.10
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i5-11400F cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Core i5-11400F vs FX-6100 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-11400F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
198
100%
Min 1% FPS
131
100%
Price, €
€117.1
22%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
27%
Core i5-11400F vs FX-6100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11400F vs FX-6100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11400F vs FX-6100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11400F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
82%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-11400F | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
$157.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
2.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
12 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |