Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 294 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400F.
Advantages of Core i5-11400F
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $88.28 vs $324.32
- Up to 71% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-12900F - $0.34 vs $1.16 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield V than Core i5-11400F - 279 vs 258 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 24 vs 12 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
258
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
279
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.16/FPS
29%
Price, €
€324.32
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €324.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11400F | vs | Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |