The Core i5-10200H is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8150. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-10200H
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 45 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the FX-8150
The Core i5-10200H is better in every way
Core i5-10200H vs FX-8150 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-10200H
Sep 17th, 2020
Average FPS
185
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-10200H vs FX-8150 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10200H vs FX-8150 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10200H vs FX-8150 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10200H
Sep 17th, 2020
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-10200H | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8150 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 17th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
45 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
| 6 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 2933 MHz, DDR4 @ 2933 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
