The Core i3-9100F is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-6100 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only $12.90 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i3-9100F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of the FX-6100
- Up to 33% cheaper – $26.71 vs $39.61
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 6 vs 4 threads
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i3-9100F cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Core i3-9100F vs FX-6100 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
186
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, €
€39.61
67%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
76%
Core i3-9100F vs FX-6100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-9100F vs FX-6100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-9100F vs FX-6100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
86%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-9100F | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
$122.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |