Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7350K outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7350K is 219 days older than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 2% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 217 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 60 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 32 vs 4 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
213
98%
Value, €/FPS
€2.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€560.32
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €560.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 446 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7350K | vs | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |