Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100 is 637 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of Core i3-7100
- Up to 95% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $42.76 vs $806.30
- Up to 95% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $0.33 vs $6.30 per FPS
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 51 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 48 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
128
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €42.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 313 minutes ago
Buy for €806.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 313 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-7100 | vs | Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 48 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 250 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |