Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10980XE outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10980XE is 382 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10980XE - 48 vs 36 threads
Advantages of Core i9-10980XE
- Performs up to 9% better in Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 61 vs 56 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $680.18 vs $806.30
- Up to 23% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $11.15 vs $14.40 per FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 165 vs 250 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €806.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
61
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€680.18
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €680.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX | vs | Core i9-10980XE |
---|---|---|
Oct 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Colfax | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 18 |
48 | Threads | 36 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
250 W | TDP | 165 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |