Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-560 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-560 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 3721 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-560.
Advantages of Core i3-560
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - $48.69 vs $280.01
- Up to 78% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 9 5950X - $0.47 vs $2.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 73 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 27% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-560 - 146 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-560 - 32 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
FPS
115
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€54.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €54.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
Buy for €310.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-560 | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |