Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-560 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-560 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 3234 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-560.
Advantages of Core i3-560
- Up to 53% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - $54.05 vs $114.41
- Up to 49% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Ryzen 7 3700X - $0.47 vs $0.92 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 7% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-560 - 124 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-560 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-560 - 16 vs 4 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
FPS
116
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€54.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €54.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6906 minutes ago
Buy for €114.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6907 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-560 | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |