Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600 is 3237 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Core i3-3250
- Up to 59% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600 - $38.95 vs $94.96
- Up to 58% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Ryzen 5 5600 - $0.23 vs $0.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i3-3250 - 192 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 12 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
189
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €43.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Buy for €105.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3250 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |