Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 3070 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Core i3-3250
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - $38.95 vs $117.33
- Up to 57% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i5-12600KF - $0.12 vs $0.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 25% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-3250 - 467 vs 374 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 16 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
374
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €43.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
467
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
43%
Price, €
€130.24
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for €130.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3250 | vs | Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |