The Core i3-3250 is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 3 3200G and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $13.58 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i3-3250
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 3200G
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 17% cheaper – $67.50 vs $81.08
- A much better value for money for gaming
Core i3-3250 vs Ryzen 3 3200G for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
179
100%
Min 1% FPS
119
100%
Price, €
€67.5
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Core i3-3250 vs Ryzen 3 3200G in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-3250 vs Ryzen 3 3200G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-3250 vs Ryzen 3 3200G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-3250
Jun 9th, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
75%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Ryzen 3 3200G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-3250 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| $138.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
55 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR4 |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
