Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4140 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2130.
Advantages of Core i3-2130
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $110.28 vs $689.87
- Up to 82% better value when playing God of War than Core i5-13400F - $0.75 vs $4.09 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 15% better in God of War than Core i3-2130 - 187 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2130 - 16 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
163
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€122.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €122.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1253 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
187
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.09/FPS
18%
Price, €
€765.76
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €765.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1253 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-2130 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |