Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Core i3-10320
- Up to 81% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $126.12 vs $671.13
- Up to 74% better value when playing New World than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $1.08 vs $4.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 37% better in New World than Core i3-10320 - 160 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 32 vs 8 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
117
73%
Value, €/FPS
€1.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€126.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €126.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7238 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.19/FPS
26%
Price, €
€671.13
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €671.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7238 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10320 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |