Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Core i3-10320
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $113.62 vs $259.70
- Up to 10% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i7-13700K - $0.70 vs $0.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 106% better in League of Legends than Core i3-10320 - 371 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 24 vs 8 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
180
49%
Value, €/FPS
€0.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€126.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €126.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
371
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
90%
Price, €
€288.27
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for €288.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10320 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |