Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 1028 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105T.
Advantages of Core i3-10105T
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $73.04 vs $221.72
- Up to 62% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-14700F - $0.31 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 15% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-10105T - 300 vs 262 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105T - 28 vs 8 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
262
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.07
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1517 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
300
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
38%
Price, €
€246.11
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for €246.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1517 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105T | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |