Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105T.
Advantages of Core i3-10105T
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $73.04 vs $730.45
- Up to 87% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-13400F - $1.45 vs $11.11 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 30% better in Starfield than Core i3-10105T - 73 vs 56 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105T - 16 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
56
77%
Value, €/FPS
€1.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.07
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
Buy for €810.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105T | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |