Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 1028 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Core i3-10105F
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $68.67 vs $309.85
- Up to 66% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-14700F - $0.19 vs $0.56 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 50% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-10105F - 558 vs 371 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 28 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
371
66%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€68.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €68.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
558
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
34%
Price, €
€309.85
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €309.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105F | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |