Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Core i3-10105F
- Up to 57% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600X - $68.50 vs $159.89
- Up to 53% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 5 7600X - $0.43 vs $0.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 12% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-10105F - 196 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
175
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€76.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €76.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
196
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
47%
Price, €
€177.48
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for €177.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105F | vs | Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |