Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 294 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105F.
Advantages of Core i3-10105F
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - $68.50 vs $105.50
- Up to 31% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-12400 - $0.62 vs $0.90 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-10105F - 130 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
122
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€76.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €76.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 282 minutes ago
Buy for €117.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 283 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10105F | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |