Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 2583 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Celeron G3900
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X - $32.39 vs $307.60
- Up to 76% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 9 7900X - $0.14 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 51 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 130% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G3900 - 579 vs 252 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
252
44%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
579
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
24%
Price, €
€341.44
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €341.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900 | vs | Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |