Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X is 2407 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Celeron G3900
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X - $32.39 vs $117.68
- Up to 65% better value when playing Battlefield V than Ryzen 7 5700X - $0.17 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X
- Performs up to 26% better in Battlefield V than Celeron G3900 - 265 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
211
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
Buy for €130.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Skylake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |