Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 3690 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Celeron G1820
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $35.67 vs $246.11
- Up to 73% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-14700F - $0.81 vs $3.04 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 84% better in Starfield than Celeron G1820 - 81 vs 44 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 28 vs 2 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
44
54%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7134 minutes ago
Buy for €246.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7134 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1820 | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
2 | Threads | 28 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
53 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |